"" Facebook's owner Meta has been penalised with a record $1 billion fine

Facebook's owner Meta has been penalised with a record $1 billion fine

Since a decade ago, there has been uproar around the movement of Facebook user data from the European Union (EU) to the US, where there tend to be fewer severe privacy regulations.

The owner of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram has been smacked with a record fine of €1.2 billion (£1.04 billion) by Ireland's data protection agency.

The general data protection standards (GDPR), which request authorization of the data holder before taking advantage of their personal information, were violated, and the resulting fine is the most expensive ever assessed.

However the highest the European Union EU court ruled in 2020 that the data was poorly protected from US surveillance agencies, Meta nevertheless received financial penalties for sending EU users' data to the US for processing.

The act has been restricted, and Facebook has been given at least five months to stop all further transfers and six months to stop collecting and keeping data in the US without approval. WhatsApp and Instagram are shielded from the decisions.

Since privacy campaigner Max Schrems filed a complaint against Facebook, as the corporation was at the time, in 2013, the problem has remained going on for ten years. Since Meta's European workplaces are in Dublin, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) in Ireland acts efficiently as the EU's privacy regulator.

meta facebook whatsapp instagram

The verdict would be appealed, according to Meta, and service wouldn't be interrupted. It was said that the action taken was "unjustified and inappropriate" and that it creates a "dangerous example". Meta noted that it is asking the judiciary to get stays of the order. Prior to Monday's sentence, Amazon acquired a €746 million fine from European Union authorities in 2021.

In order to encourage safe and lawful data sharing, the EU and the US are collaborating on a new agreement that may be running by the summer but may possibly run into legal difficulties. Meta stated in April that it hopes the agreement to be finalised before being forced to stop the current, illegal data circulation.

Services will still be offered even if the arrangement is not in place, according to Meta. Earlier, it had stated that the restriction might cause services in Europe to be halted. In a call with financiers last month, Meta measured that stopping the data transfer would cost 10% of its advertising income, which is considerably larger than the £1 billion fine implemented on Monday.

According to (Science and technology editor) Tom Clarke

This fine is historic. The European Union's GDPR regulations faced the largest ever response.

But how badly will Meta concern about it?

The $1.3 billion (£1 billion) fine from the Irish authorities won't have much of a lasting effect on Meta, the company that operates Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp, with a market capitalization of $680 billion (£546 billion).

Only 1% of its total per year revenue from advertisements is received by Facebook. But it undoubtedly shows the EU is willing to deal with major internet firms over how they handle the data of its citizens.

Furthermore, Meta has been given five months to develop a fresh procedure for shielding EU data from the prying eyes of the United States authorities or other third parties.

In fact, the project is already in progress.

The administration of Joe Biden is already developing a framework for EU-US privacy concerns that will comply by GDPR requirements if data is sent from Europe to the United States.

While Meta has filed an appeal to this court's decision, its rivals will be keeping a careful eye on how it moves forward with a new strategy for handling client information from Facebook and other networks.

But Big Tech repeatedly shows that it is skilled at staying one step ahead of regulations in terms of creative methods to profit off the data of their consumers. The confidentiality and security practises of Meta or one of its competitors will continue to be criticised.

Post a Comment